Link is http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_2101-2150/ab_2109_cfa_20120501_150815_asm_comm.html
Here is a short exerpt:
)Rationale . According to the author, this bill preserves a
parent's option to exempt their child from immunization
requirements and ensures that a decision to do so is an
informed one, based on accurate and up-to-date information
regarding individual and public health risks of not immunizing
their child. According to the author, the number of vaccine
exemptions has increased dramatically in the last decade,
leading to real concern about the loss of "herd immunity" and
potential for serious disease outbreaks, particularly in
school classrooms and communities whose exemption rates can
exceed 40%. He indicates that misinformation widely available
on the internet and sensationalist media reports have made it
more difficult for parents to receive accurate, fact-based
information about vaccines and to ascertain what information
is reliable. In addition, he indicates the bill will preserve
the right to exemption for those with deeply held beliefs,
while deterring parents who may request an exemption out of
convenience. Under current law, exemption only requires a
parent's signature and is simpler than submitting proof of
vaccination.
This bill is supported by a wide range of public health
agencies and medical associations, and is co-sponsored by the
California Medical Association, California Immunization
Coalition, American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Health
Officers Association of California.
AB 2109 would require a parent or guardian seeking a personal belief exemption for their child to obtain a document signed by themselves and a licensed health care practitioner. This bill preserves a parent’s option to exempt their child from immunizations, but also ensures that such a decision is an informed one and that the parent is aware of the individual and public health risks of not immunizing their child.
I consider this bill similar to forcing a woman to go see a doctor who counsels the woman to not have an abortion.
ReplyDeleteLet the parents decide whether to have their child vaccinated or not. It is not the job of medical establishment to support such a bill.
The only reason - it is more money in their pocket, either by vaccinating or charging for an unnecessary office visit.
Guess who introduced this bill - a freakin doctor! I bet this guy is in bed with the vaccine manufacturers. I guess he figured out that (surprise, surprise) he can make more money being a politician than from medical practice!
Shame on this doctor and the ***wipes who are supporting this bill!
Thank you for providing such a valuable information and thanks for sharing this matter.
ReplyDelete